Case Studies

These anonymized examples show the project outline, scope, deliverables, outcome, and possible next steps without disclosing client-specific information.

Game development prototype

Unity Prototype Validation

Turned a core play idea into a small playable validation scope so the team could make implementation decisions earlier.

Case type: Game development prototype
Customer type: Small game development team
Period: About 2 to 4 weeks
Background: The team wanted to test the core interaction early and decide the formal development scope before committing to full implementation.

Challenge: The team could not judge feel, pacing, or scope from documents alone, and the planned feature set was expanding.
Scope: Implemented a minimum game loop, input, camera, UI, tunable data, and review steps.
Deliverables: Playable validation build / Implementation notes / Next-question list
Outcome: Separated what to keep, cut, or validate again before full development.
Possible next expansion: Can expand into additional stages, tuning tools, or builds for user testing.

Before / After

Before

Core interaction decisions depended mainly on documents
The boundary between must-keep and optional features was unclear

After

A review build made the feel easier to judge early
Keep, cut, and revalidate items were separated before full development

Technologies

Game release preparation and service integration

Steamworks Integration and Release Preparation

Reviewed achievements, leaderboards, localization, and build steps that often create late-stage release friction.

Case type: Game release preparation and service integration
Customer type: Team preparing a Steam-oriented title
Period: About 1 to 3 weeks
Background: Gameplay work was moving forward, while the team needed a clearer path for Steam release tasks and external service checks.

Challenge: Store integration and release checks were concentrated late in development, separate from gameplay work.
Scope: Organized Steamworks integration approach, achievement and leaderboard design, localization keys, and build checks.
Deliverables: Integration checklist / Setup steps / Implementation direction notes
Outcome: Made release requirements visible early and converted them into implementation tasks.
Possible next expansion: Can extend into store-page preparation, test flow, and operation log review.

Before / After

Before

Release checks were concentrated late in development
Achievement, leaderboard, and localization checks were scattered

After

Release preparation items were turned into earlier tasks
Checklist and setup notes reduced missed integration checks

Technologies

Business improvement and automation

Excel and CSV Workflow Automation

Replaced repeated manual aggregation with a small import, validation, and reporting workflow.

Case type: Business improvement and automation
Customer type: Business team working with Excel and CSV every day
Period: About 1 to 4 weeks
Background: Daily aggregation and checks were split across spreadsheet files and depended heavily on manual operation.

Challenge: Daily copying, aggregation, and checking depended on manual work, with time lost on error checks and corrections.
Scope: Organized CSV import, validation rules, aggregation, report output, and exception handling.
Deliverables: Automation script / Validation report / Operation notes
Outcome: Reduced repeated work and made exceptions easier to identify.
Possible next expansion: Can expand into scheduled runs, notifications, dashboards, or an admin interface.

Before / After

Before

Multiple files were copied and aggregated manually
Every row had to be checked before exceptions could be found

After

Import, validation, and output were organized into one flow
Review work could focus on exception data

Technologies

Business application and admin interface

Admin Interface and Internal Tool Development

Designed an admin interface around permissions, search, CSV import and export, action history, and notification timing.

Case type: Business application and admin interface
Customer type: Company moving internal management away from spreadsheets
Period: About 3 to 8 weeks
Background: Internal operations were still handled through spreadsheets and shared files, making permissions and change history difficult to manage.

Challenge: Spreadsheet and shared-file operations made it hard to track who changed what and where checks were missed.
Scope: Organized screens, permissions, data fields, search conditions, import and export, logs, and notifications.
Deliverables: Admin interface / Data design notes / Operation and maintenance notes
Outcome: Made everyday search, review, update, and history tracking available from a single interface.
Possible next expansion: Can extend into more roles, approval flows, external APIs, and reporting.

Before / After

Before

Change history and permissions were hard to track in spreadsheets
Search, review, and updates were split across files

After

Daily operations were consolidated into one admin interface
Permissions, action logs, and CSV flows were organized for future extension

Technologies

Start with an email.

Start a Conversation